SNODDY v. TEEPAK, INC.

No. 1-89-1049.

198 Ill. App.3d 966 (1990)

556 N.E.2d 682

LINDA J. SNODDY, Special Adm'x of the Estate of Larry Snoddy, Deceased, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. TEEPAK, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees (PPG Industries, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants).

Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (1st Division).

Opinion filed May 14, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hinshaw, Culbertson, Moelmann, Hoban & Fuller, of Chicago (Daniel W. McGrath and Bruce L. Carmen, of counsel), for appellant PPG Industries, Inc.

Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz, of Chicago (Richard C. Robin and Jeanne M. Cole, of counsel), for appellant Stauffer Chemical Company.

Stevenson, Rusin & Friedman, Ltd., of Chicago, and Battle Fowler, of New York, New York (Stephen J. Friedman, Larry J. Chilton, Michael J. Malone, and Steven B. Carlin, of counsel), for appellee Teepak, Inc.


Order affirmed.

JUSTICE O'CONNOR delivered the opinion of the court:

On November 27, 1984, Linda Snoddy et al. (plaintiffs) filed a complaint alleging battery against Teepak, Inc. (Teepak). Subsequently, plaintiffs filed four amended complaints, which added additional plaintiffs and strict liability claims against Stauffer Chemical Company (Stauffer) and PPG Industries (PPG). Plaintiffs alleged that Stauffer and PPG manufactured or supplied one of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases