GILLESPIE v. KONONEN

TC CSC 88-0481; CA A49273; SC S36540.

797 P.2d 361 (1990)

310 Or. 272

Joanne GILLESPIE, Alan Cummings, and Naomi Cummings, Respondents On Review, v. Mary A. KONONEN, Petitioner On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided August 30, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony L. Worth, Pendleton, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Peter Fels, Pendleton.

Joanne Gillespie, Portland, argued the cause pro se for respondent on review.

No appearance for respondents on review Alan and Naomi Cummings.

Before PETERSON, C.J., and CARSON, JONES, GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY and UNIS, JJ.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Justice.

The issue in this FED action is whether the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction over a case in which the trial judge has refused to enter a final judgment. We conclude that the Court of Appeals does have jurisdiction.

Defendant Kononen was a tenant in an apartment owned by Gillespie and managed by plaintiffs Cummings. On June 8, 1988, the Cummings sent Kononen a "72-hour Notice To Pay Rent or Move," former ORS 91.820(2) (now ORS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases