CONLIN v. BLANCHARD

No. 88-CV-71578-DT.

745 F.Supp. 413 (1990)

Richard F. CONLIN, Richard L. Fitzpatrick, Roger A. Ruppal, and Richard J. Victorson, Plaintiffs, v. James J. BLANCHARD, Governor of the State of Michigan; Martha W. Griffiths; Frank J. Kelley; John Roy Castillo; John F. Hueni; Robert H. Naftaly; Doug Ross; Elizabeth P. Howe; James P. Pitz and C. Patrick Babcock, members of the Michigan Equal Employment and Business Opportunity Council (MEEBOC); John F. Dodge, Jr.; Walter R. Greene; Patricia B. Johnson and Alan A. May, members of the Michigan Civil Service Commission; Dorothy Haener; Benny Napoleon; Beverly Clark; Sondra L. Berlin; Eva Evans; Michael C. Hidalgo; Rev. William Holly and Philip Van Dam, members of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission; Robert A. Bowman, State Treasurer; James A. Pitz, Director of the Michigan Department of Transportation, and the State of Michigan, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D.

August 30, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles J. Porter, Bloomfield Hills, Mich., for plaintiffs.

Dianne M. Rubin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Detroit, Mich., for defendant Civil Rights Com'n Members.

Deborah Anne Devine, Asst. Atty. Gen., State Affairs Div., Lansing, Mich., for defendants Blanchard and MEEBOC Members.

Leo H. Friedman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Natural Resources Div., Lansing, Mich., for defendants Robert A. Bowman and James P. Pitz.

Scott Moore, Southfield, Mich., for defendants Members of Civil Service Com'n.


OPINION

GILMORE, District Judge.

At issue in this case is the validity under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Affirmative Action Plan of the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) and, inferentially, the affirmative action policies of the entire State of Michigan. For the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that Plaintiff has no basis for complaint under the Fourteenth Amendment, and that MDOT's Affirmative Action Plan and the State's affirmative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases