1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 51 Ohio
  5. 51 Ohio St. 3d 64 (1990)
 

KUNKLE v. KUNKLE

No. 89-140.

51 Ohio St. 3d 64 (1990)

KUNKLE, APPELLEE, v. KUNKLE, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 9, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Drake, Phillips, Kuenzli, Clark & Weasel and William E. Clark, for appellee.

Jude T. Aubry Co., L.P.A., and Jude T. Aubry, for appellant.

DOUGLAS, J.

The issues before this court focus on the award and payment of sustenance alimony. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in not terminating sustenance alimony payments on a date certain? May a trial court, pursuant to R.C. 3105.18 (A) and (B), award sustenance alimony based on a fixed percentage of the payor's gross annual income less FICA? When may a trial court make sustenance alimony payments chargeable against the payor's estate?

In Ohio...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases