Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
On appeal from a judgment convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, defendant argues that the court erred in charging accessorial liability. That issue is unpreserved and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice (CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Nor do we find that defendant was denied the effective assistance of counsel by his attorney's failure to object to the charge on accessorial liability (see generally...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.