Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum:
The court did not abuse its discretion in denying respondent's motion to dismiss and in compelling respondent to accept late service of the complaint. In view of the county's inordinate delay of nine years in perfecting this appeal, it should not be heard to complain about plaintiff's five-week delay in serving the complaint. We add, however, that both parties have been guilty of egregious
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.