ATKINS v. DESCHUTES COUNTY

LUBA 89-146; CA A64628.

793 P.2d 345 (1990)

102 Or.App. 208

Eloise ATKINS, Petitioner, v. DESCHUTES COUNTY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 20, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Greg Hendrix, Bend, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Parker, Hendrix & Chappell, Bend.

Bruce W. White, Asst. County Legal Counsel, Bend, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

LUBA affirmed Deschutes County's determination that petitioner's property is not a "legal lot of record" under the county's Ordinance 88-009. Petitioner seeks review and argues that the lot should be accorded that status, because it was included in an unrecorded survey filed with the county surveyor in 1963.1 The ordinance, which was enacted after that time, does not recognize that kind of filing as a way of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases