U.S. v. STRINGFELLOW

No. 89-55500.

911 F.2d 225 (1990)

UNITED STATES of America, et al., Plaintiffs, and State of California, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. J.B. STRINGFELLOW, Jr., et al., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 10, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marcelle E. Mihaila and Kenneth S. Klein, Gray, Cary, Ames & Frye, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-counter-defendant-appellant.

Robert P. Dahlquist and Richard W. Raushenbush, Latham & Watkins, San Diego, Cal., for defendants-counter-claimants-appellees.

Before BROWNING and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges, and COPPLE, District Judge.


PER CURIAM:

Kammer, an attorney for the State of California, filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings on the ground appellees' counterclaims against the State were preempted by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). The magistrate, whose findings were adopted by the district court, denied the motion and sanctioned Kammer for failing to cite a Northern District of Illinois case and certain CERCLA provisions....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases