MENDOLA v. PAROLE VIOLATORS' PRISON

03-89-002-PVP; CA A60700.

793 P.2d 343 (1990)

102 Or.App. 187

John MENDOLA, Petitioner, v. PAROLE VIOLATORS' PRISON, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 20, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. Storkel, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Ann Kelley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Yuan Xing Chen, Certified Law Student, Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner, an inmate at the Oregon State Parole Violators' Prison, seeks review of an order finding him in violation of several prison disciplinary rules. He contends that the hearings officer interfered with his right, under OAR 291-105-061 and the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause, to call witnesses in his defense. We reverse and remand.

The prison initiated this proceeding on misconduct reports about petitioner's transfer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases