Order unanimously affirmed with costs.
Memorandum:
Supreme Court did not err in denying defendant's motion for summary judgment. There is a question of fact whether the parties' contract is one for "services", governed by the six-year Statute of Limitations (CPLR 213 [2]), or one for the "sale" of goods, governed by the four-year Statute of Limitations (Uniform Commercial Code § 2-725 [1]; see, Farm Automation Corp. v Senter,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.