DIANA JEWELERS OF LIVERPOOL, INC. v. A.D.T. CO., INC.


167 A.D.2d 965 (1990)

Diana Jewelers of Liverpool, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. A.D.T. Company, Inc., Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

November 16, 1990


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Plaintiffs contend that Special Term erred in granting defendant's motion for summary judgment on the ground that the action was barred by the parties' contractual period of limitation. They assert that the one-year period of limitation for commencing suit provided in the contract is void as contrary to public policy because the complaint alleges willful or gross negligence. We disagree. The contractual...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases