SATO v. SCHOSSBERGER

No. 18416.

792 P.2d 336 (1990)

117 Idaho 771

Clifford SATO and Bettie Sato, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Peter S. SCHOSSBERGER, Defendant-Respondent, and St. Anthony Community Hospital, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

May 17, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Petersen, Moss, Olsen, Meacham & Carr, Idaho Falls, for plaintiffs-appellants. William C. Carr argued.

Merrill & Merrill, Pocatello, for defendant-respondent. Wesley F. Merrill argued.


JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a medical malpractice case that was dismissed for lack of prosecution under I.R.C.P. 40(c). We affirm the dismissal, except as to the claim that the doctor did not properly and fully advise the patient of the risks she was facing in the surgery. We hold that it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to dismiss this claim.

I. THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS.

In July 1978 Bettie Sato (the patient) consulted Dr...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases