1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 59 Wn.
  5. 59 Wn. App. 53 (1990)
 

ROMANICK v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY

No. 24776-0-I.

59 Wn. App. 53 (1990)

795 P.2d 728

RON ROMANICK, Appellant, v. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

August 27, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick H. LePley and Tobin & LePley, for appellant.

John C. Versnel III, John Patrick Cook, and Lee, Smart, Cook, Martin & Patterson, P.S., Inc., for respondent.

SCHOLFIELD, J.

The plaintiff, Ron Romanick, assigns error to the trial court's decision granting Aetna's motion for summary judgment on the theory that Romanick was not entitled to underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits from Aetna. We affirm.

FACTS

On January 8, 1988, Romanick filed a complaint for declaratory judgment, seeking a determination as to whether he was entitled to UIM benefits under his policy of

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases