Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
The trial court properly concluded that, with the exception of tape-recorded telephone calls dated April 22 and 23, 1986 involving defendant, the "third set" of tape-recorded conversations did not constitute Rosario material. The trial testimony of Investigator Urtis did not encompass conversations recorded on the "third set" of tapes. Therefore, those conversations were not relevant and did not "[relate] to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.