1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 795 P.2d
  5. 795 P.2d 319 (1990)
 

STRATE v. CAMBRIDGE TELEPHONE CO., INC.

No. 18120.

795 P.2d 319 (1990)

118 Idaho 157

W. Eugene STRATE and Alice Strate, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Respondents, v. CAMBRIDGE TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Respondent-Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

July 19, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tway & Rosenheim, Boise, for plaintiffs-appellants-cross-respondents. William J. Tway argued.

Lary C. Walker, Weiser, for defendant-respondent-cross-appellant.

BURNETT, Judge.*

This appeal and cross-appeal arise from a contract dispute. The appellants, Eugene and Alice Strate, maintain that the district court should have awarded them consequential damages for a breach of contract. The cross-appellant, Cambridge Telephone Company, argues that the district court erred in finding that the contract contained an oral modification and in failing to find that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases