1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 451 N.W.2d
  5. 451 N.W.2d 659 (1990)
 

STATE v. OTTO

No. C3-89-1591.

451 N.W.2d 659 (1990)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Jan OTTO, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied April 13, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Peter A. Cahill, St. Louis Park City Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Faison T. Sessoms, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by LANSING, P.J., and HUSPENI, and KALITOWSKI, JJ.

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant alleges that a computer printout, the only evidence showing that his prior conviction had not been obtained in violation of his right to counsel, was insufficient to enhance his DWI charge from a misdemeanor to a gross misdemeanor, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 3(a). We affirm.

FACTS

The district court computer printout for appellant's case history indicates that on May 28, 1986, he was appointed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases