The evidence before the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board established that claimant left her normal labor market area where she had a job to return to, went to an area where she had no transportation and where job opportunities were limited, and that her search for work was not meaningful. Under the circumstances, the Board's conclusion that claimant was unavailable for employment was supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Goodman [Catherwood],...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
