Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree, arguing that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress a lineup identification because there was no photograph of the lineup and because the lineup was inherently suggestive due to the fact that defendant was the only participant with dreadlocks. Although the failure to preserve a photograph of the lineup gave rise to a...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
