Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant's contention that his statements to the police were involuntarily made, due to alleged "psychological coercion" by the police, is lacking in merit. We conclude that the hearing court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress his statements to police because they were made after defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his rights (see, People v Prochilo,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.