1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 908 F.2d
  5. 908 F.2d 197 (1990)
 

U.S. v. CITY OF CHICAGO

Nos. 89-2395, 89-2715.

908 F.2d 197 (1990)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeals of Linda L. NELSON, Mary J. Jones, Marsha S. Feldman, Bernice Ziolkowski, Diane J. Olsen, Doris J. Bullock (Washington), Carole Allen, Patricia Stube, Jane Kelley, Sharon Urbon, Joanne Ryan, Alberta R. Gordon, Joan Beibel, Ann Erwin, Juanita Johnson, and Ellen Nolan Egan.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided July 24, 1990.

As Amended July 25, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anton R. Valukas, U.S. Atty., Margaret C. Gordon, Asst. U.S. Atty., Office of the U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., Cynthia Drabek, Office of the U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Employment Litigation Section, Dennis J. Dimsey, Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Appellate Section, Marie K. McElderry, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for U.S.

John L. Gubbins, Gubbins & Associates, Kimberly A. Sutherland, Sidney Z. Karasik, Lydon & Griffin, Richard M. Gutman, Perry L. Fuller, Hinshaw, Culbertson, Moelmann, Hoban & Fuller, Heidi Streeky-Genet, Holstein, Mack & Klein, Charles D. Knight, Rothchild, Barry & Myers, Robert A. Filpi, Stack & Filpi, John F. McCarthy, McCarthy & Levin, Chicago, Ill., John F. Small, Hickory Hills, Ill., Roslyn C. Lieb, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Judson H. Miner, Robert L. Janega, Ruth M. Moscovitch, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Sarah Vanderwicken, Frederick S. Rhine, Kelly R. Welsh, Asst. Corp. Counsels, Jay M. Kertez, Office of the Corp. Counsel, Appeals Div., Chicago, Ill., for defendants-appellees.

Before BAUER, Chief Judge, CUDAHY and POSNER, Circuit Judges.

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

This suit was originally filed against the City of Chicago by the United States government in 1973, a long, long time ago. The suit alleged that the City had discriminated on the basis of race and gender in hiring into and promoting within its Police Department in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. In January of 1976, the district court found that the City had followed an explicit policy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases