STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. 89-229.

51 Ohio St. 3d 58 (1990)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAMS, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 9, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. Meyers, prosecuting attorney, and Ronald J. Mayle, for appellant.

Robert G. Hart, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

We are asked to determine whether the stop and frisk of appellee by Deputy Garst violated appellee's right, as guaranteed by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. We answer such query in the negative, as Deputy Garst's conduct was lawful under the dictates of Terry v. Ohio (1968), 392 U.S. 1, and its progeny.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases