SMITH v. BALDWIN-LIMA HAMILTON SALES CORP.


160 A.D.2d 935 (1990)

Wayne A. Smith, Appellant, v. Baldwin-Lima Hamilton Sales Corporation, Defendant, and Armour and Company, Inc., et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 23, 1990


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

We conclude that the Supreme Court properly granted the respondents' motion for summary judgment inasmuch as the plaintiff failed to set forth evidentiary facts sufficient to raise a triable issue as to the successor liability of either the respondent Armour and Company, Inc., or the respondent Greyhound Lines, Inc. (see, Grant-Howard Assocs. v General...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases