FUSCO v. P & S CONST. CO.

No. 89-63.

564 So.2d 526 (1990)

Salvatore FUSCO, Appellant, v. P & S CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and General Accident Insurance Company, and the Hartford Insurance Company, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 26, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry S. Prettyman, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.

Thomas J. Tansey, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees P & S Const. Co. and General Acc. Ins. Co.

Mal Steinberg, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees P & S Const. Co. and The Hartford Ins. Co.


ZEHMER, Judge.

Salvatore Fusco appeals a workers' compensation order denying him benefits on the ground that his injuries were not compensable. Claimant asserts on appeal that the judge of compensation claims erred in ruling that the logical cause doctrine was inapplicable to his claim, and in rejecting evidence that he suffered a work-related accident that was the cause of his injuries. We reverse because the evidence is insufficient to support the judge's order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases