Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant was convicted of burglary in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree and petit larceny. Defendant first contends that the court erred in conducting a portion of the voir dire at the Bench, in the presence of both counsel, but in his absence. That issue has not been preserved for review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) and this is not an appropriate case to review in the interest of justice (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.