Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
On appeal from convictions of second degree burglary and petit larceny, defendant argues that accomplice testimony was not sufficiently corroborated (see, CPL 60.22 [1]) and that the trial court erred in its charge on reasonable doubt. Neither claim has merit. The evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Smith,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.