1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 52 Ohio
  5. 52 Ohio St. 3d 56 (1990)
 

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSN. OF CINCINNATI, INC. v. PROJECT JERICHO

Nos. 89-579 and 89-592.

52 Ohio St. 3d 56 (1990)

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF CINCINNATI, INC., APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. PROJECT JERICHO; ANTCZAK ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 20, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laufman, Rauh & Gerhardstein and Alphonse A. Gerhardstein, for appellee and cross-appellant.

Condit & Dressing Co., L.P.A., James J. Condit, John W. Dressing, Charles T. Lester, Jr. and Thomas W. Condit, for appellants and crossappellees.

Peter J. Kadzik, Elaine Metlin, Frances A. Scibelli, Brown, Cummins & Brown Co., L.P.A., and Amy G. Applegate, urging reinstatement of the trial court's certification of a class for amicus curiae, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Ohio, Inc.

H. BROWN, J.

We must determine whether the trial court abused its discretion by finding appellants in contempt for violating the injunction under either Civ. R. 65(D) or Civ. R. 23. We hold that the trial court properly exercised the discretion it had pursuant to both Civ. R. 65(D) and Civ. R. 23.

I

First Amendment Considerations

The First Amendment guarantees the right to publicly communicate views and to express dissension. Demonstrators...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases