Joel Gregory ARNOLD, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Anderson GAINES, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Edwin Francis HOOPER, Jr., Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Gary Wayne PAYNE, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Peggy Marie TAYLOR, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 24, 1990.
Rehearing Denied March 7, 1990.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Robert T. Baskett (court appointed on appeal only), Dallas, for Arnold.
Henry Wade, former Dist. Atty., John Vance, Dist. Atty., and Donald G. Davis, Norman Kinne and Mark Hasse, Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
David R. Weiner (court appointed on appeal), San Antonio, for Gaines.
Sam D. Millsap, Jr., former Dist. Atty., Fred G. Rodriguez, Dist. Atty., and Edward F. Shaughnessy, III, Phylis West, Juan Chavira and Raymond J. Hardy, Jr., Asst. Dist. Attys., San Antonio, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
George O. Jacobs, Houston, Jim Vollers, Austin, for Hooper.
John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., and Harvey Hudson, Dan Rizzo and Leslie Brock, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
John H. Hagler (on appeal only), Dallas, for Payne.
Henry Wade, former Dist. Atty., John Vance, Dist. Atty., and Mary Jo Kain, Thomas R. Gregg, Stephen Miller and Pamela Sullivan Berdanier, Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
Danny D. Burns, Fort Worth, for Taylor.
John Vance, Dist. Atty., Kathi Alyce Drew, Marcus Busch and Mark Hasse, Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
Before the court en banc.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
OPINION ON PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
These causes present various aspects of application of Tex.R.App.Pro.Rule 81(b)(2) to "statutory" error at the punishment stage in charging a jury on parole law pursuant to Article 37.07, § 4, V.A.C. C.P. Rose v. State,752 S.W.2d 529 (Tex.Cr. App.1987-1988). "Rose error" is giving an instruction in terms of the constitutionally infirm statute...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
