CITY OF EDINA v. DREHER

No. C7-89-1920.

454 N.W.2d 621 (1990)

CITY OF EDINA, Respondent, v. Roger H. DREHER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied June 15, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Marshall Halberg, David J. McGee, Thomsen, Nybeck Law Firm, Edina, for respondent.

Steven D. DeRuyter, Leonard, Street & Deinard, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and FOLEY, and GARDEBRING, JJ.


OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

This is an appeal from judgment against appellant for violating a city ordinance that prohibits a person from keeping an animal which by any noise disturbs the peace and quiet of persons in the vicinity. Appellant argues that the city ordinance denies him due process of law. We reverse.

FACTS

On August 14, 1989, an Edina community officer was dispatched by the police department to answer a citizen's complaint that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases