1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 217 Cal.App.3d
  5. 217 Cal.App.3d 848 (1990)
 

KHAN v. SHILEY INC.

Docket No. G006922.

217 Cal.App.3d 848 (1990)

266 Cal. Rptr. 106

JUDY M. KHAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SHILEY INCORPORATED et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

January 30, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, Bruce A. Finzen and Joseph L. Dunn for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron, Frank C. Rothrock and L. Richard Rawls for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

SONENSHINE, J.

Plaintiffs appeal after the trial court granted summary judgment against them in their action involving an allegedly defective mechanical heart valve. They contend the court applied incorrect legal principles in concluding that in light of the fact the valve implanted in Judy M. Khan's heart had not yet malfunctioned, any grievances were speculative and their lawsuit premature.

I.

Judy Khan...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases