ta itemprop="width" content="200">
Leagle.com Leagle.com Leagle.com
Sign in
 

H.T. v. A.E.

Not in source.

57 Misc.3d 1023 (2017)

62 N.Y.S.3d 921

H.T., Plaintiff, v. A.E., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Richmond County.

Decided October 27, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Catherine Bridge, Staten Island ( Catherine Bridge of counsel), for defendant.

Kuharski, Levitz & Giovinazzo, Staten Island ( Michael Kuharski of counsel), for plaintiff.


OPINION OF THE COURT

By post-dispositional motion (seq. No. 012), defendant wife A.E. seeks an order vacating this court's decision after trial dated January 3, 2017 and replacing it with a modified decision which restructures the way child support is to be paid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases

    MOATES v. REGISTER | 556 So.2d 503 (1990) | so2d5031999 | Leagle.com
     

    MOATES v. REGISTER

    No. 89-1818.

    556 So.2d 503 (1990)

    Randall Scott MOATES, Appellant, v. James REGISTER, Individually; and James Register, D/B/a the Car Lot, Appellee.

    District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

    February 6, 1990.


    Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

    Thomas F. Slater, of Margol & Pennington, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellant.

    W. Roderick Bowdoin, of Darby, Peele, Bowdoin & Payne, Lake City, for appellee.


    ON MOTION TO DISMISS

    PER CURIAM.

    Appellant seeks review of a summary judgment in favor of appellee. After the notice of appeal was filed, appellant sought and obtained leave of the trial court to amend his complaint and drop appellee as a party. Two other defendants remain as parties below. Appellee now moves to dismiss this appeal arguing that this court does not have jurisdiction over him, as he has been dismissed as a party in the lower tribunal. We do...

    Let's get started

    Leagle.com

    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
    Sign on now to see your case.
    Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

    • Updated daily.
    • Uncompromising quality.
    • Complete, Accurate, Current.

    Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

    Cited Cases

    • No Cases Found

    Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

    Citing Cases