1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 798 P.2d
  5. 798 P.2d 258 (1990)
 

STATE v. GLOSTER

10-88-03957; CA A61418.

798 P.2d 258 (1990)

103 Or.App. 484

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Cindy Dawn GLOSTER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 26, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay W. Frank, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Moule & Frank, Eugene.

Rives Kistler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals her conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4)(b), arguing that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress. At oral argument, defendant conceded that her argument depended on our affirming the suppression order in State v. Gloster, 103 Or.App. 473, 798 P.2d 256 (decided this date). Because we reverse in that case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases