CON-TECH, INC. v. SPARKS


798 S.W.2d 250 (1990)

CON-TECH, INC., a corporation, and Roy N. Strickland, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. J. Collier SPARKS, Fries Correctional Equipment, Inc., a corporation, and E.S.S., Inc., a corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section, at Nashville.

Permission to Appeal Denied October 1, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas W. Hardin, Hardin, Matthews, Ewing & Barnes, Columbia, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Dennis J. Meaker, Robert E. Boston, Waller, Lansden, Dortch & Davis, Nashville and Terrence Lee Croft, Griffin, Cochrane, Marshall & Elger, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellees.


Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court October 1, 1990.

OPINION

CANTRELL, Judge.

This case involves the application of sanctions under Rule 11 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure. The trial judge found that the original plaintiffs, Con-Tech, Inc. and Roy N. Strickland, and their attorney, William M. Bouldin, had violated Rule 11 and assessed attorney's fees and costs against them in the amount of $31,510.93. For the reasons set forth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases