ARNOLD, Judge.
Appellant makes a number of assignments of error, but we examine only two.
The State contends it was prejudicial error for the trial court to allow cross-examination of the State's appraisal witness concerning his knowledge of the sale prices of several noncomparable properties located in the area. This cross-examination was an
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.