Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the hearing court erred in denying that branch of his motion which was to suppress identification testimony on the ground that the pretrial identification procedures employed were tainted is without merit. The hearing court's determination that neither of the pretrial identification procedures was unduly suggestive is supported by the credible evidence adduced at the hearing. Thus, we decline to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.