DAGNOLI v. SPRING VALLEY MOBILE VILL.


165 A.D.2d 859 (1990)

Gladys M. Dagnoli et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarily Situated, Respondents, v. Spring Valley Mobile Village et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

September 24, 1990


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendants' contentions, the plaintiffs have adequately established that the requirements of CPLR 901 (a) for the maintenance of a class action have been met in this case. Inasmuch as there is a large number of readily identifiable class members, joinder is impracticable (see, CPLR 901 [a] [1]; Friar v Vanguard Holding Corp., 78 A.D.2d 83; Ammon v Suffolk...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases