1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 917 F.2d
  5. 917 F.2d 96 (1990)
 

U.S. v. WOO

Nos. 100, 101, Dockets 90-1099, 90-1153.

917 F.2d 96 (1990)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. WOO, et al., Defendants, Chumpol Eampanit, Jin Liang Toon, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided October 23, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stuart D. Rubin, Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendant-appellant Chumpol Eampanit.

Colleen P. Cassidy (The Legal Aid Society, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellant Jin Liang Toon.

Alan M. Vinegrad, Asst. U.S. Atty. for the E.D. of N.Y. (Andrew J. Maloney, U.S. Atty. for the E.D. of N.Y., Susan Corkery, Jacques Semmelman, Asst. U.S. Attys., of counsel), for appellee.

Before KAUFMAN, WINTER and MINER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial before Judge Dearie, appellants Chumpol Eampanit and Jin Liang Toon were convicted of having participated in a large heroin conspiracy. We discuss each appellant's claim seriatim.

First, Eampanit argues that the evidence against him was legally insufficient. We disagree. The evidence showed that Eampanit, a former loan officer and manager of a finance and trust company, traveled from California to New York to earn $40,000...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases