1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 786 P.2d
  5. 786 P.2d 227 (1990)
 

STATE v. STOCKFLETH

86-3-30485, 86-3-30486; 86-3-30488; CA A44567 (Control); A45133.

786 P.2d 227 (1990)

STATE of Oregon, Appellant, v. KATHLEEN R. STOCKFLETH, Respondent. State of Oregon, Appellant, v. Michael John Lassen, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Filed October 25, 1989.

Decided February 7, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Jonathan H. Fussner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, for appellant.

Wayne Mackeson and Des Connall, P.C., Portland, for respondent, Stockfleth.

No appearance for respondent, Lassen.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

On Appellant's and Respondent Stockfleth's Petitions for Reconsideration December 27, 1989.

BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

In this consolidated appeal by the state from orders suppressing evidence obtained by court-ordered wiretaps, the state's only argument on appeal was that the trial court erred in concluding that the orders authorizing the wiretaps contained inadequate "termination" provisions. Defendant Stockfleth contended that the trial court did not err...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases