U.S., FOR MID SEVEN TRANSP. v. BLINDERMAN CONST.

No. 89 C 4654.

735 F.Supp. 272 (1990)

UNITED STATES of America, for the Use and Benefit of MID SEVEN TRANSPORTATION, Plaintiff, v. BLINDERMAN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

March 22, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William L. Fairbank, Whitefield, Musgrave & Eddy, Des Moines, Iowa, Leonard R. Kofkin, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

John T. Evrard, Peterson, Ross, Schloerb & Seidel, Chicago, Ill., for Venetian Iron Works, Inc.

Marc S. Mayer, Zaban, Jacobs and Mayer, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.


ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is the motion of plaintiff, subcontractor, Mid Seven Transportation, for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a) on its Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270a et seq., claim against defendants, general contractor, Blinderman Construction and surety, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland for $16,576.67 allegedly owing for the transportation of materials from third-party defendant, subcontractor,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases