GRADY v. CORBIN

No. 89-474.

495 U.S. 508 (1990)

GRADY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DUTCHESS COUNTY v. CORBIN

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 29, 1990


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bridget R. Steller argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs was William V. Grady, pro se.

Richard T. Farrell argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Stephen L. Greller and Ilene J. Miller.


JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

We have long held, see Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304 (1932), that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment1 prohibits successive prosecutions for the same criminal act or transaction under two criminal statutes whenever each statute does not "requir[e] proof of a fact which the other does not." In Illinois

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases