DICKIE v. DICKIE

86-9-239; CA A47228.

769 P.2d 225 (1989)

95 Or.App. 310

George Laird DICKIE, III, Respondent, v. George Laird DICKIE, Jr., and Delores Carney Dickie, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 22, 1989.

Reconsideration Denied April 21, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phil M. Kelley, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Roscoe C. Nelson, Jr., Portland, and Nelson & Kelley, Portland.

Charles J. McClure, Tigard, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was McClure & Schwab, Tigard.

Before GRABER, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


GRABER, Presiding Judge.

George Dickie, Jr. (George, Jr.) and Delores Dickie (Delores) appeal from a judgment in favor of George Jr.'s son, George Dickie, III (George III). They claim that the trial court erred in finding that George III gave George, Jr. consideration to support their contract to make a will and in enforcing that contract during the life of George, Jr.1 We affirm.

In 1974, George Dickie, Sr. (George, Sr.) sold...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases