PER CURIAM.
The appellant was convicted by a jury for possession of cocaine. In our view, the state failed to present sufficient, independent proof to establish that the defendant was in constructive possession of the cocaine. See Hively v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.