FRAGA v. FRAGA

Nos. 88-853, 88-2200 and 88-2292.

555 So.2d 427 (1989)

Olga M. FRAGA, Appellant, v. Antonio O. FRAGA, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rehearing Denied February 13, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Young, Stern & Tannenbaum and Glen Rafkin and Andrew S. Berman, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Barranco, Kellough & Kircher, Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton Meadow & Olin; Daniels & Hicks and Angela C. Flowers and Sam Daniels, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of discretion in the overall equitable distribution, Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980). We note, however, that the amended final judgment, section V, contains the incorrect statement that the permanent alimony award is predicated upon appellant's receiving certain tax-free payments. Under the amended judgment there will be no tax-free payments. We therefore remand for correction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases