1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 865 F.2d
  5. 865 F.2d 103 (1989)
 

STEWART v. DOW CHEMICAL CO.

No. 87-2223.

865 F.2d 103 (1989)

Basil STEWART, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DOW CHEMICAL CO., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided January 11, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jules B. Olsman, Woll, Crowley, Berman & Olsman, Royal Oak, Mich., Robert Sedler (argued), Detroit, Mich., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Joseph J. Ortego, Rivkin, Radler, Dunne & Bayh, Uniondale, N.Y., Michael H. Whiting, Stark, Reagan & Finnerty, Troy, Mich., Michael A. Makulski (argued), Dow Chemical Co., Midland, Mich., for defendant-appellee.

Before WELLFORD and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and SIMPSON, District Judge.

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

Stewart and the other plaintiffs appeal from a dismissal of their product liability claims based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens. He, along with the other plaintiffs in this action, are citizens of New Brunswick, Canada, who sued Dow Chemical, Co. (Dow), a Michigan corporation, in a federal district court in Michigan. Dow moved to dismiss on a number of grounds, including that of forum non conveniens, claiming that New Brunswick...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases