1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 384 S.E.2d
  5. 384 S.E.2d 581 (1989)
 

STATE v. WALL

No. 8920SC4.

384 S.E.2d 581 (1989)

STATE of North Carolina v. Reuben Carl WALL.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

October 17, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. General Thornburg by Asst. Atty. Gen. Thomas G. Meacham, Jr., Raleigh, for the State.

Henry T. Drake, Wadesboro, for defendant-appellant.

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant's arguments regarding the guilt phase of his trial can be reduced to two contentions. First, defendant contends there is a fatal variance between the allegations in the indictment and proof of the sale and delivery charges because the indictment names McPhatter as the purchaser of the cocaine from Wall on the sale and delivery charges while the proof tends to show that Riley was the purchaser. Defendant also argues there was no evidence presented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases