MAIL-WELL ENVELOPE CO. v. EMP. DIV.

88-AB-956; CA A49152.

779 P.2d 178 (1989)

98 Or.App. 271

MAIL-WELL ENVELOPE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION AND PATRICIA L. CODY, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 6, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry K. Amburgey, David J. Riewald and Bullard, Korshoj, Smith & Jernstedt, P.C., Portland, filed the brief for petitioner.

Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Jerome Lidz, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, waived appearance for respondent Employment Div.

No appearance for respondent Patricia L. Cody.

Before GRABER, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and EDMONDS, J.


GRABER, Presiding Judge.

In this unemployment compensation case, employer seeks review of an Employment Appeals Board order reversing the referee's denial of benefits. The assignment of error attacks EAB's conclusions in their entirety. Employer states that the question presented is whether EAB's conclusion is supported by substantial evidence. Most of employer's argument, in effect, asks that we undertake de novo review. We do not have that authority. ORS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases