COFNAS v. TOMASES


145 Misc.2d 807 (1989)

Rebecca Cofnas, Plaintiff, v. Arthur Tomases et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Kings County.

May 23, 1989


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Solin & Breindel, P. C. (David L. Ferstendig and Jean-Pierre Garnier of counsel), for Schering Corporation, defendant. Garbarini & Scher, P. C., for Arthur Tomases, defendant. Fisher & Seidner, P. C. (Larry Rosenfeld of counsel), for plaintiff.


NICHOLAS A. CLEMENTE, J.

In an action to recover for alleged medical malpractice, plaintiff has asserted causes of action against a physician, Arthur Tomases, and a drug manufacturer, Schering Corporation. The drug manufacturer now moves for an order pursuant to CPLR 3212 granting it summary judgment.

The substance of the claim against Schering is that as a drug manufacturer, it failed to give adequate warnings of the hazards associated with use...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases