1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 724 F.Supp.
  5. 724 F.Supp. 224 (1989)
 

MONAHAN v. PAINE WEBBER GROUP, INC.

No. 88 Civ. 1723(MEL).

724 F.Supp. 224 (1989)

Thomas A. MONAHAN, Plaintiff, v. PAINE WEBBER GROUP, INC., d/b/a PaineWebber, Inc., formerly d/b/a Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., and Robert J. Hume, III, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

November 2, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chapman, Moran, Hubbard & Zimmerman, New York City, for plaintiff; of counsel John Haven Chapman.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City, for defendants; of counsel Max Gitter, Mary E. Crawley.

LASKER, District Judge.

Thomas A. Monahan is one of a group of former employees who sued Paine Webber Group, Inc. ("Paine Webber") under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 (1982). In an earlier opinion, the RICO complaint was dismissed for failure to state a cause of action and, in the alternative, on the grounds that the claims were barred as res judicata. Cullen v. Paine Webber Group, Inc.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases