SUBSEQUENT INJURY FUND v. TENEYCK

No. 36, September Term, 1989.

317 Md. 626 (1989)

566 A.2d 94

SUBSEQUENT INJURY FUND v. JOHN W. TENEYCK ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Motion for Reconsideration Denied December 20, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joanne F. Voelkel, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Sophia L. Swope, Asst. Atty. Gen., Towson, all on brief), for appellant.

Herbert J. Arnold, Janet D. Bacot, James P.A. O'Conor, Jr., Law Offices of John W. Hershberger, II, on brief, Baltimore, for appellees.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, COLE, RODOWSKY, McAULIFFE, ADKINS and BLACKWELL, JJ.


ADKINS, Judge.

The issue in this workers' compensation case is whether Maryland Code (1957, 1988 Cum.Supp.), Article 101, § 36(3)(d), a "scheduled member" provision of the Workmen's Compensation Article, applies when the claimant qualifies for compensation from the Subsequent Injury Fund pursuant to Maryland Code (1957, 1985 Repl.Vol.), Article 101, § 66, and the worker's prior impairment is to a "scheduled member."1 The appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases