1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 153 A.D.2d
  5. 153 A.D.2d 785 (1989)
 

MATTER OF KRUPCZAK v. MANCINI

153 A.D.2d 785 (1989)

In the Matter of Ambrose M. Krupczak et al., Appellants, v. Albert V. Mancini et al., as Commissioners of The Montgomery County Board of Elections, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Ambrose M. Krupczak et al., Appellants, v. Albert V. Mancini et al., as Commissioners of The Montgomery County Board of Elections, et al., Respondents. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Michael Raphael, Respondent, v. Albert Mancini et al., as Commissioners of The Montgomery County Board of Elections, Respondents, and Deborah De Vito, Appellant. (Proceeding No. 3.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

August 24, 1989

Per Curiam.

In proceedings Nos. 1 and 2, we agree with Supreme Court that the proceedings are untimely because they were not commenced within the 14-day time period prescribed by Election Law § 16-102 (2). Since petitioners are not candidates whose petitions have been declared invalid by the Montgomery County Board of Elections, we reject their contention that the 14-day limitation is inapplicable because they did not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases