1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 868 F.2d
  5. 868 F.2d 69 (1989)
 

HOHE v. CASEY

No. 88-5735.

868 F.2d 69 (1989)

HOHE, Mary A.; Cassel, Timothy L.; Clover, Joseph F., III; Clover, Vickie M.; Ebersole, Steven A.; Garman, Linda R.; Hetzel, Arlene J.; Hench, Carol D.; Hill, Francis D.M., Jr.; Kantorczyk, Mark A.; Lebo, Nancy; Maher, Gerald J.; Morris, Jeri; Reefer, Jack H., Jr.; and Young, Thompson M., II, Appellants, v. Robert P. CASEY, Governor, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; Joseph L. Zazyczny, Secretary of Administration, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; G. Davis Greene, Jr., State Treasurer, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and Council 13, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided February 16, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John G. Milakovic, Thomas A. Beckley, Charles O. Beckley, II, Beckley & Madden, Harrisburg, Pa., Raymond J. LaJeunesse, Jr. (argued), National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc., Springfield, Va., for appellants.

Alaine S. Williams, Kirschner, Walters & Willig, Philadelphia, Pa., Richard Kirschner (argued), John J. Sullivan, Kirschner, Weinberg & Dempsey, Washington, D.C., for appellees Council 13 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO.

Leroy S. Zimmerman, Atty. Gen., Thomas B. York, Deputy Atty. Gen., Gregory R. Neuhauser, Sr. Deputy Atty. Gen., John G. Knorr, III, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Chief, Litigation Section, Harrisburg, Pa., for appellees Robert P. Casey, Joseph L. Zazyczny, G. Davis Greene, Jr., and The Com. of Pa.

Before GIBBONS, Chief Judge, and SEITZ and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs appeal from the district court's order of September 15, 1988 denying their motion for a preliminary injunction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). Since the plaintiffs have failed to show that they would suffer irreparable harm absent the issuance of a preliminary injunction, we will affirm.

We review the district court's order under an abuse of discretion standard...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases